Directory
AI Models on Finance Benchmarks
AI models scored on public finance benchmarks (analyst research, Excel modeling, corporate tax), with sample sizes, margins and the price per million tokens on the date we checked.
| Model | Maker | FAB v2 | EMB | Tax Agent | API price per 1M tokens (in / out) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini 4 Argon | 65.40% ±0.32 | 75.24% ±2.46 | 44.56% ±3.59 | $4.00 / $20.00 | |
| Gemini 3.8 Flash | 61.44% ±0.13 | 72.20% ±2.42 | 32.12% ±3.37 | $1.50 / $7.50 | |
| Muse Spark 1.2 | Meta | 60.60% ±0.28 | 56.98% ±3.13 | 32.80% ±2.75 | $1.25 / $4.25 |
| Claude Opus 5.5 | Anthropic | 58.59% ±0.17 | 75.94% ±2.38 | 45.57% ±3.59 | $4.00 / $20.00 |
| GLM 5.3 Flash | Z.ai (zAI) | 57.85% ±2.06 | 55.93% ±3.56 | 31.55% ±3.35 | $0.07 / $0.25 |
| GPT-5.6 Luna | OpenAI | 55.04% ±0.31 | 67.12% ±2.94 | 24.82% ±3.11 | $0.20 / $1.20 |
| Ling 3.0 Flash Fin | Ant Group | 54.93% ±0.68 | 36.83% ±3.33 | 20.60% ±2.91 | $0.06 / $0.18 |
| Grok 4.6 | SpaceXAI | 53.68% ±0.67 | 62.73% ±3.08 | 33.14% ±3.40 | $2.00 / $6.00 |
A benchmark is not a trading test. These scores measure answers to analyst, modeling and tax questions graded by AI judges. Differences smaller than the published margins are not meaningful.
Head-to-head comparisons
- Gemini 4 Argon vs Claude Opus 5.5
- Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Muse Spark 1.2
- Gemini 4 Argon vs Gemini 3.8 Flash
- GPT-5.6 Luna vs Grok 4.6
- GLM 5.3 Flash vs Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
We only publish a comparison when both models have results on the same published benchmarks. See also the AI Analyst Scoreboard and the AI tools directory.